What Is True Success? Philosophers vs. Hustle Culture

The Success Problem

You've seen it: the entrepreneur who built the empire but has no close relationships. The executive who reached the top but feels empty. The influencer with millions of followers and crippling anxiety.

By conventional measures, they succeeded. By almost any other measure, they're struggling.

Ancient philosophers predicted this. They warned that our common definitions of success are traps—they promise fulfillment but can't deliver it. They offered an alternative.

Let's examine what they found.

The Default Definition

Modern culture defines success as:

Money and financial security

Status and recognition

Achievement and accomplishment

Power and influence

There's nothing inherently wrong with these things. The problem is treating them as the goal rather than potential byproducts of a well-lived life.

Aristotle pointed this out 2,400 years ago: external goods are "goods of fortune." You don't fully control them. And even when you get them, they don't satisfy.

Why? Because you've been chasing the wrong thing.

Aristotle's Alternative: Eudaimonia

Aristotle's word for the ultimate good was eudaimonia—often translated as "happiness" but better understood as "flourishing" or "living well."

Eudaimonia isn't a feeling. It's an activity—the activity of living according to virtue, developing your potential, engaging in meaningful work and relationships.

Here's the key insight: eudaimonia is self-sufficient. It doesn't depend on external validation. If you're developing your capabilities, contributing meaningfully, and living according to your values—you're flourishing. Whether others recognize it, whether the money follows, whether you become famous—those are separate questions.

Aristotle's success metrics:

Are you developing excellence in activities that matter?

Are you living according to virtue—courage, justice, wisdom, temperance?

Do you have meaningful relationships?

Are you engaging in worthwhile work?

Is your life characterized by reason rather than mere impulse?

Notice what's missing: "Are you richer than last year?" "Are you more famous?" "Did you beat the competition?"

The Stoic View: Success Is Internal

The Stoics radicalized this further.

For Marcus Aurelius, success couldn't depend on externals at all—because externals aren't under your control. True success must be something you can achieve regardless of circumstances.

"If you do the job in hand with diligence and energy—not looking around for distraction but keeping your mind pure and free—if you do this, expecting nothing, fearing nothing, but satisfied with your current activity according to nature, and with heroic truth in every word and sound you utter—you will live a blessed life."

Success, for the Stoics, is:

Acting with integrity in this moment

Focusing on what's under your control (your character, your effort, your choices)

Responding to events with wisdom and virtue

Not being jerked around by external outcomes

You can be "successful" in a prison cell by this definition. You can be a "failure" on a yacht.

Buddha's Critique: Success That Leaves You Wanting More

Buddha saw something else: most conceptions of success are based on craving—wanting things that can't ultimately satisfy.

You want the promotion. You get it. You feel good for a while. Then you want the next promotion. The pattern continues forever.

This is samsara—the cycle of craving and temporary satisfaction that never reaches lasting peace.

Buddhist "success" is different:

Freedom from compulsive craving

Equanimity that doesn't depend on conditions

Compassion that extends to all beings

Wisdom that sees through illusion

Notice: none of these require achievements, wealth, or status. In fact, attachment to achievements actively undermines them.

The Hustle Culture Trap

Modern hustle culture takes everything the philosophers warned about and makes it into a lifestyle:

Never enough—always optimize, scale, grow

External metrics as identity—you are your achievements

Rest as failure—productivity as the measure of worth

Competition as frame—zero-sum thinking

The burnout epidemic shouldn't surprise us. People are exhausting themselves chasing definitions of success that can't fulfill.

Hustle culture says: "Work harder and you'll finally feel successful."

The philosophers say: "You'll never feel successful that way—you're chasing the wrong thing."

Redefining Success

What if success looked like this?

Daily engagement in meaningful work — Not necessarily prestigious or lucrative, but genuinely important to you.

Deep relationships — A few people who know you well and whom you know well. Quality over quantity.

Character development — Becoming more patient, more wise, more courageous over time.

Inner peace — A baseline of equanimity that doesn't require everything going right.

Contribution — Making a positive difference, however small, in ways you can actually see.

Integrity — Living according to your values, not just your incentives.

None of these require wealth, fame, or power. All of them are largely within your control.

The Practical Question

Here's a test: Imagine you achieve your current goals. You get the money, the recognition, the achievements you're chasing.

Now imagine that along the way, you've:

Destroyed your health

Lost your closest relationships

Compromised your values

Lost touch with what actually matters to you

Would you consider that success?

Most people say no. Which reveals: you already know that conventional success metrics are incomplete. You already know they're proxies for what you actually want.

The philosophers suggest cutting out the proxies and pursuing the actual goods directly.

A Different Approach

Step 1: Define your own success

What would a genuinely good life look like for you? Not what you've been told to want. What do you actually want?

Get specific. Not "happiness" but what happiness consists of for you.

Step 2: Audit your current pursuits

Are the things you're working toward aligned with your definition? Or are you chasing society's metrics hoping they'll deliver your goals?

Step 3: Adjust

This might mean pursuing the same things with a different orientation—working hard but not tying your worth to outcomes. Or it might mean pursuing different things entirely.

Step 4: Measure what matters

Track your actual goals—relationships, character, meaning—not just the default metrics. Are you making progress on what you actually value?

The Paradox

Here's what's funny: people who pursue Aristotle's eudaimonia often end up achieving conventional success anyway.

Why? Because they're focused on developing excellence, contributing meaningfully, and building genuine relationships—all of which tend to produce external rewards as byproducts.

The difference is they're not dependent on those rewards. If the money comes, great. If it doesn't, they're still flourishing.

And crucially, if the conventional success comes with compromises they're not willing to make, they can walk away. They're not trapped.

The Invitation

The philosophers aren't saying don't achieve, don't build, don't succeed by any external measure.

They're saying: don't confuse the measure for the thing. Don't sacrifice the actual goods for the symbolic ones. Don't spend your one life chasing metrics that can't fulfill you.

You get to define success. Most people don't—they accept the default definition and wonder why achievement feels hollow.

What does success actually mean to you? Not to the culture, not to your parents, not to your industry—to you?

That's worth figuring out.

Because you're going to spend your life pursuing something. Better make sure it's the right thing.

---